Now With FlavorCrystals!

Friday, June 23, 2006

Watson's Girl

It's weird, but I have totally had many recents conversations regarding the Watson's girl, and then Erin sent me this:

COWTOWN CONFIDENTIAL

Enough to make your brain hurt

Hearne Christopher Jr.
Morrison

Misunderstood by many, lusted for by losers — the Watson’s Girl is about to be immortalized.

Full Frontal Comedy, a professional comedy improv troupe that operates out of the Olathe Community Theatre, will perform a spoof of longtime Watson’s pool and patio TV spokesmodel Jennifer Foley as part of its show “My Brain Hurts.”

“I play the Watson’s Girl, and Bill Case plays her stepdad,” says Full Frontal owner/director Tina Morrison. “It starts off with one of their commercials with me saying, It’s hot! You need a pool!”

“Then a reporter from The Kansas City Star — but not you — asks about their relationship. And I say, ‘Well, he’s my stepdad.’ And while she’s asking the questions, Bill and I are being a little touchy-feely. And she asks, ‘Why isn’t your mom in the commercials? What happened to her?’ ”

Columnist insert: For years Watson’s Girl aficionados have wondered if the older dude in the TV spots was some sort of sugar daddy. Both are on record in this column that that’s definitely not the case.

The skit continues …

“We get a little risqué with some of our answers with some double entendre stuff,” Morrison says. “Then the reporter says, ‘You guys are creeping me out. You guys have a little Woody Allen, Soon-Yi thing going on.’ ”

The skit screeches to a halt when the stepdad goes off on the Star scribe, Morrison says.

“The last thing he says as he walks out is, ‘Tell Hearne Christopher he can kiss my (rear)!’ ”

What Morrison really thinks of the Watson’s Girl: “She’s not shy about showing off her body; I’m sure she’s a lovely person,” Morrison says. “I’m sure a lot of men enjoy her commercials.”

Now that Morrison has played the Watson’s Girl role herself, is she ready to fill in for future a TV spot?

“No, I’m an A cup,” Morrison quips. “Nobody buys a pool from an A cup.”

The shows goes down tonight, Saturday and next weekend. For information call (913) 403-4340 or check out www.full frontalcomedy.org.

Friday, June 09, 2006

Bad Notes

The more we went to the Jazz Museum, the more we got the blues.

By Justin Kendall

Article Published May 11, 2006


Knowing how important jazz is to the history of Kansas City, your proteinaceous pontificator has paid several visits to the American Jazz Museum at 18th Street and Vine, seeking to learn everything it can by gazing at Charlie Parker's alto saxophone and Ella Fitzgerald's American Express card.

OK, maybe not exactly. The Strip will confess that over the last few visits, its motives haven't always been pure. You see, last fall, local blogger Happy in Bag wrote about his disappointing evening at the museum's attached nightclub, the Blue Room. The guy was pissed after finding a display in disarray — the sleeve for the Mary Lou Williams album The Lady Who Swings the Band had fallen and was leaning against its glass case. Eight weeks later, the guy returned, and the Williams tribute was still a mess. Happy in Bag had been willing to give the museum the benefit of the doubt, but now he complained about the neglect: "The staff either doesn't know or care about the problem."

The Strip went to check it out. As this swingin' sirloin sauntered through the aisles of vintage photos, records and instruments associated with Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington and Dizzy Gillespie, it couldn't help noticing the museum's kinks. A film about the history of jazz was besieged by a "please replace the lamp" warning at the bottom of the screen. "This station is being repaired," read the sticker attached to a TV screen meant to show the Duke Ellington Orchestra. One stop on the Thinking in Jazz exhibit was just a shell; someone — a maintenance worker, we hope — had ripped out its burnt-out monitor. And sure enough, the Mary Lou Williams record was leaning against the glass.

It was enough to make any slab of meat sing the blues. A couple of months later, in January, the Strip got to thinking. It had just read about how the Bring New Orleans Back cultural committee had recommended building an all-in-one museum, archive, performance hall and recording studio to help reinvigorate the devastated city. Hell, the Strip figured, Kansas City should donate its own jazz museum to needy New Orleans — that way, we'd help the cause and unload an embarrassment all at once!

The Strip chewed on that idea until March, when City Auditor Mark Funkhouser put out a report on agencies outside City Hall that get big chunks of Kansas Citians' money. The city contributes nearly a third of the American Jazz Museum's annual budget — $674,000 in each of the last two years. Funkhouser's auditing team, JMA Chartered, wrote that the museum hadn't been keeping track of "the fixed assets, artifacts, and collectibles under its control" but owned by the city. Moreover, for the second year in a row, the museum hadn't put money from charitable donors — to the tune of $87,250 in 2005 — into an endowment account. And, auditors said, authorized personnel weren't preapproving expenditures.

Back to the museum this cranky cutlet went. The big-screen TV had been fixed, but the Ellington monitor was busted, and now a photo had come unglued. Thinking in Jazz was still a shell. In the Blue Room, the Williams record remained where it had been in October — and other items in cases along the Blue Room's wall were jacked up, too. As the Strip snooped around, a DVD playing jazz performances in the background started skipping.

This perturbed patty went back to its office and put in a call to the museum's executive director, Juanita Moore. Unbelievably, when the Strip informed Moore of its beef, Moore blamed the Strip!

"You should have been nice and said something to someone that it was broken," Moore railed. "But you didn't want to? That wasn't nice of you."

"This isn't on me," the Strip shot back.

"It is if you really care about it," Moore retorted, saying the Strip didn't need an appointment to talk to her. She flamed this startled steak a little more: "I'm a little bit disappointed in you."

Well, the Strip was also disappointed — in Moore and her museum. Isn't it the museum director's job to make sure that things don't get screwed up in the first place, instead of relying on visitors to point out when things need fixing? Or to maybe take a walk through the place every once in a while so that displays don't stay screwed up for six months?

Days later, the Strip met with Moore. This blog-reading burger gave her a copy of Happy in Bag's critical piece.

"What's a blog?" Moore asked.

After the Strip explained that a blog is an Internet journal (a Web log), Moore assured the Strip that the Blue Room displays had since been fixed. After the Strip's call, she had, in fact, found the displays in question messed up. She'd done some digging herself and discovered that the vibrations from bands playing in the Blue Room have been jarring the exhibits. She didn't blame the jazz musicians, though. Instead, she blamed the happy-hour band, which she called more contemporary and much louder. She also blamed the patrons, who, she said, accidentally bump the cases when they move the tables.

Moore lamented the fact that the Jazz Museum is nearly a decade old. Much of the technology is out of date, she said, pointing to the Ellington monitor.

"A number of the things now, in order to replace them, we have to send them to England to get parts because they're old," Moore said. "It's constantly needing repair just for the fact that it is old and technology is changing and they run ... six days a week and everything is constantly on and the wear and tear and use of it is tremendous."

Moore, the museum's director of operations and programs in the '90s, took over from the museum's founding director, Rowena Stewart, in April 2002. (Previously, Moore was the executive director of the National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee, from 1991-96.) She's already planning a redesign of the permanent exhibit. She says things will be completely different, but it will take a minimum of three years. "That's a million-dollar project," Moore said. "It really is. But that's our goal. It's a dream, but it's a dream that's definitely going to become a reality."

When it came to Funkhouser's audit, Moore told the Strip that her crew had addressed the findings immediately. In 2004, auditors found that the Jazz Museum's "accounting records were incomplete and fraught with errors and omissions." The museum solved the problem by hiring a new finance director, she said. Regarding the endowment, she said, "Even before the city wrote that report, that money was paid [to the endowment]. You will see that that won't be a problem this year."

When it came to the "fixed assets, artifacts and collectibles under its control," Moore said the museum staff didn't realize that was their responsibility.

"We just assumed the city was handling it," Moore said. "We assumed responsibility for the collection. We didn't assume responsibility for every table, chair ... which was never quite our understanding."

The Strip's glad all that's settled now.

Moore got sentimental and explained why she loves her work: People go to museums because they want to be there. And, yeah, she said, she understood how a busted display might offend jazz lovers. But then she lit into everyone who didn't speak up.

"It's like I asked you, what is a blog?" she said. "Who is supposed to read [that]? Is somebody who's going to fix the problem going to read the blog? That's my point. So tell somebody."

Er, the Strip will, but it hopes it won't have to. It hopes museum visitors won't see messed-up displays in the first place. At the very least, it hopes someone checks the Mary Lou Williams case after every jumpin' happy hour.



Monday, June 05, 2006

School School School School

I got this great forward from Erin where this girl goes to catch the bouquet and her boobies are popping out of the top of her dress, but, unfortunately, I can't get the picture to show up here. I am not computer-savvy enough to figure out what the problem is.

I'm getting ready to take 9 hours this summer, two classes that are seminars, so instead of doing it all spread out over the summer, I'm taking two solid weeks of class, including weekends. I do that fun gig twice--once in June, once in July. Then I'm taking a third class as an independent study.

Next semester I think I'm going to try for 16 hours. I'm not a masochist, I'd just like to finish my degree sometime in the nearer rather than furthur future.

I also have been looking at getting a different part-time job. I am meeting with the Clinton Lake Museum people next week. That would be perfect, because then I could go out to Lawrence every day as my normal schedule, and either work or go to school. It would also allow me to do a lot of stuff with my program I have been missing out on being a commuter, like the student association, the alumni meetings, the lectures, etc.

Quick brag moment: I pulled straight A's last semester. Yay, me! Also, I am trying to get my final project published in a preservation journal in the UK. Which is fun, but also means hours more in the lab. Yuck.

Finally, on the school front, I think I have lost my mind. I applied for a job as a director of a local historical society and house museum. It's basically what I want to do when I graduate. But it opened up now, and these jobs don't come along every day, so I thought, "what the heck?" Now I'm terrified I'll actually get an interview. And more terrified I won't. I mean, first of all, what was I thinking applying for it--I'm not nearly ready for that. And what if they think I can do it and hire me and everyone finds out I'm a big fat fraud? Really, I should stay safe in graduate school as long as possible. I like to set people up with low expectations so they're pleasantly surprised. Let them count on you for big things and shit, the pressure's on, you know?

Wedding blogging is happening at my wedding website, www.schlomar.blogspot.com But the juicy stuff will be here. I'm compiling material as we speak.

The Perils of Being Evil

Yes, I know it's been 1 million years since I posted. . .

So I've been watching Angel Season 4. I've decided it's like Buffy season 6. Very dark, nobody likes how all the characters go all weird and opposite of their normal character-y.

Anyhoo, I just had a couple of observations about Evil.

1. Any girl could tell you when a female is evil. Just look at the color of her nail polish. Is it maroon to black? The style of her clothes--victoriana bordering on gothic? Her hair. . .has she traded in blonde highlights for raven tresses. These are all clues, boys. Read them and weep.

Cordy goes evil (it was out years ago so I hope I'm not spoiling it for anyone). But she hides up in her room at the Hyperion so Angel and the others can't see her. Good thing, too, because my guess is they would take one look at her and think "hmmm. . .gothic shirt, plum-colored lipstick, black nails, dark hair, TONS of eyeline. . .OMG!!! Cordy's evil!" Maybe that's what Angel meant when he said he just "figured it out." Lame.

So I think they would have found out Cordy was the Master faster had they just done a quick fashion inventory. Sending Connor up there was bad news because he's an 18-year old boy, what does he know? He can't be expected to figure this shit out.

2. So Gunn and Fred are the two dumbest people breathing on the show, and they're all like, "Angel is evil Angeles now--diabolical and tricky with his mind games. Hey, you two. Yeah, the dumbest people on the show? Yeah, I'm talking to you. Why don't you go on down there in the basement with Angelus and guard him for a while. When you're feeding him, why not get close enough so he can smash your head into the bars, okay? Yup, that would be greeeeat. Think you could take care of that for us? Cool."

3. WARNING: X-MEN SPOILERS AHEAD!

Joss Wheadon is, like, obsessed with the evil/not evil thing. He's done it with almost every character, oh, EVER! So Angel sometimes turns Evil, we all know this by now. And they always have the whole--if you love me, you'll kill me when I'm evil song and dance. Now with Cordy--she's evil, but she's still in there, think you can chop her head off? Sure.

So imagine my surprise at the multi-plex. I am enjoying my first movie in ages. X-Men III. Awful movie, by the way, Leona and I were actually guessing lines before people said them, it's that bad and predictable. But anyway, it was like watching any episode of Angel Gone Wild combined with the season ending of Buffy Season 6.

Jean is undead. She's gone evil. No, she's still in there. Nope, there's nothing of her left. Are you prepared to kill her dammit! No, I'll save her! No, never mind, I'll kill her anyway. Because I love her. . .*sniff* Is it just me, or have we seen this dog and pony show somewhere before?

Then, when Jean goes evil--no one notices the wardrobe evil girl clues. She wears a blood red gothic outfit with puffed sleeves and a corset. Hellooo? Lots of eyeliner. Plus, when she gets all creepy:
1. Her eyes turn all black
2. Her skin gets all veiny
3. Her voice gets all funny
4. She rises up and floats off the ground
5. Her hair turns black
Talk about an Evil Willow rip-off. They could have at least marginally attempted to do something original. At least Evil Willow was funny. Evil Jean is just boring and psychotic. Not in a funny, ha-ha kind of psychotic way either. ("Bored now.")

Then, Wolverine has to do the whole "I'm prepared to kill Jean even though I love her routine." In the end, he is the only one who can get close to her. Even though she's trying to push him away he keeps on coming. Just like Xander. However, instead of saving her with a touching story about a yellow crayon, Wolverine eviscerates her. Then he's like, I'm doing this because I love you. She even thanks him for it.

I'm sorry, but I'll take the yellow crayon story any day of the week. In Jean's case, it's kind of an allegory about how those with mental illness are better off dead, because they can't be brought back to sanity, so their only relief can be found in evisceration by a good friend.

4. Was anyone else feeling a homosexual allegory in the X-Men movie? Not that there's anything wrong with that. No, seriously, it's like the mutants are able to be "cured" and they're all like, "there's nothing wrong with us." and then the government is going to eradicate them and. . .hmmm. Perhaps I'm taking it too far. What did you guys think?


Thursday, January 12, 2006

freaking hilarious

I don't know why but I still haven't stopped laughing from these vintage Weight Watchers recipe cards.

I haven't been blogging much, because it's come to my attention that I have far too much on my plate.

Between grad school, PDC, the coffee shop, trying to exercise more regularly, and wedding planning, there is simply no available time to play like I used to:(

Picked and ordered bridesmaid dresses. Here they are: I'm always amazed at how all the bridesmaid and bridal models always look so slutty. They're like, "yeah, I'm a DIRTY bride. Whatcha gonna' do about it, big boy?"

See? This is the "model ad" for my wedding dress. Slutastic!

Thursday, January 05, 2006

NOT DEAD YET

Just feel like it. . .

So, the holiday whirlwind is over. After a jam-packed Christmas holiday, we boarded a plane for Birmingham, AL to see Ian's Dad. Following that, we visited friends in Atlanta, then went camping in the North Carolina Mountains for New Year's. I feel like we've done nothing but eat and drink for weeks, and I notice the gym is very crowded these days.

I keep seeing this Yoga magazine at my grocery store and I thought it looked dumb. Stuck on the plane, I got one, and it's really good! I also am addicted to Domino, a subscription to which makes a fantastic housewarming gift for a friend.

My roomie moves out the 14th and I will miss her--so that's kind of sad. I have pics of the christmas tree for cbaby, albeit a month later.

Don't get excited--this was a white elephant gift we got at Eric's party. The sad thing is, some girl actually traded with us--she and her husband are apparently "trying." ew. Anyway, some people really don't understand the "white elephant" concept. Gifts at this party included champagne and a blender. now, I'm no expert, but if it's cool and you actually want it, then it's not a white elephant gift.

Eric's big pimpin' here.

Friday, December 16, 2005

freakishly long toes


Things I can do with my freakishly long toes:

pick up laundry off the floor with my bare feet

peel a banana (not that you'd want to eat it afterwards)

interlace my toes like you can with your hands

hook them around things and pull them toward me

i like my toes:)

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

I.D. Round III

From Greg (thanks) http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1110AP_Creationism_Professor.html

A lot of you have probably already heard but the guy got canned, I mean, uh, resigned. Well, whatever, he shouldn't have written provocative emails on his work account and gotten them posted to a public listserve, but whatever dumbass things he did it kind of reinforces my fear that we are now living in a time of such religious conservatism that it almost borders on "if you're not with us, you're against us." Yeah, real healthy attitude. On both sides. It sickens and disgusts me. I mean, the prof. here was pretty outrageous, too. People like him make it harder for people like ME not to sound like a whack job.

Here's the problem I have with the Intelligent Design debate. People kind of have this attitude like, "all opinions are equal, and it makes total sense that we should have equal time for all sides of the issue. Yeah, let the KIDS decide. Put the evidence in front of them and the better one will win out. What's wrong with giving equal time for Intelligent Design in science classrooms."

Okay, people, with a little help from Webster's here, this is the definition of "THEORY":
1 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
2 : abstract thought : SPECULATION
3 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art
4 a : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action b : an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances -- often used in the phrase in theory
5 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena
6 a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation b : an unproved assumption : CONJECTURE c : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject

Now, when most people discuss The Theory of Intelligent Design, they try to present it as a THEORY under definition 5--a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain a phenomena. However, this is incorrect. In reality, Intelligent Design only qualifies as a THEORY under definition 2--as in, ABSTRACT THOUGHT OR SPECULATION.

What do I mean by this? Well, Intelligent Design cannot be tested using the Scientific Method. You can observe that there are things in the Evolutionary Theory that cannot be explained. You can formulate a hypothesis to explain this phenomena, namely, that a divine or supernatural entity "fixed" the things that are currently unexplainable, BUT and it's a BIG BUT, you cannot use this hypothesis to accurately predict future phenomena, nor can you use it to predict quantitative results of new observations. In addition, IT CANNOT BE REPLICATED with experimental tests. Therefore, it is not SCIENCE. it's PHILOSOPHY.

Now, the Theory of Evolution is still, excuse the pun, evolving. Much like how Hooke first described the "cells"he saw in cork, and named them after prison cells, but now understand more accurately the full complexity and scope of the modern Cell Theory, Evolution has also moved beyond Darwin's original formulation of his hypothesis. Through the Scientific Method, scientists have added and expanded our knowledge base, amending this hypothesis through replicatable experiments through time.

The theory of Evolution may not be perfect, but it is the basis for almost all understanding of all modern medicine and much of modern science. For example, scientists can actually track and test evolutionary changes in simple organisms such as Viruses. How do people think they come up with each year's flu shots? Scientists simply track the mutations of the viruses and predict, based on pathology and such, which virus group will be the most prevalent the next year. Then they mix up batches of shots to fight that particular virus. We can actually see evolution happening in hospitals where new strains of bacteria have EVOLVED that are resistant to most antibiotics. These super-bacteria are super-lethal and it's kind of important that the scientists who do work in these fields don't just say "well, God made the bacteria change. Guess we'd better go pray!"

As a non-scientific THEORY, rather, as a SPECULATION on the ultimate cause of biological change over time, i.e. that God did it, Intelligent Design is an interesting concept but not really that useful in Scientific Study. I would rather have people learn the Evolutionary Theory with their time in Science Class, so that they will be prepared for understanding this basic building-block of biological knowledge, rather than debating God in the Science Classroom.

For this, I am a closed-minded, radical, left-wing, communist sympathizer who probably doesn't even believe in God and therefore should not be trusted, right?

That's what the Theocracy wants you to believe. I'm not going down without a fight.

Wine and Beer






Have you ever been to one of those parties where, the more people drink, the more active they get? Usually, people mellow out and the party peters out to the porch where maybe a few people smoke and gradually everyone leaves or falls asleep? Well, my friend Robin hosted a party Thanksgiving weekend (in honor of her honey, Mark, visiting from New York), and it was a blast. Before I knew it, a bunch of late-twenty and thirty-somethings were demonstrating their best '90s dance moves, break dancing, doing synchronized swimming on the hardwood floors, and generally participating in all-around merriment. I have more embarrassing pics that I won't post here, namely, Ian doing the in-out-in-out foot dance step they do in the Breakfast Club (and teaching it to all the boys) and me doing the splits. . .